Shocks, on the other hand, explain our data well. Moreover, J-typeīow shocks are a possible, though not very probable, explanation for ourĭata, since they work only if the bows are extremely wide. Models of slabs of gasĪt one single or two constant temperatures fail to account for our data,Īs do fluorescence, and planar J- and C-shock models. Surprisingly, the 2-1 S(1)/1-0S(1) and the 3-2S(3)/1-0S(l) line ratiosĪre largely constant everywhere in the outflow. Images, yield the excitational state of the H2 gas. Line ratio maps, built from the molecular hydrogen The precession angle, precession period, and possibly also for theīinary separation. A crude precession model then yields estimates for WigglesĪnd sideways positional offsets of bows in the flow are interpreted asĭue to precession. From these and from the spectral energyĭistribution the Cep E source appears to be a Class 0 binary. We find two almost perpendicular outflowsĮmanating from Cep E. S(1), and, for the first time in any outflow, the 3-2S(3) line of We present images of the outflow from Cep E in the 1-0S(1), the 2-1 The mean of the experimentally calculated values agrees better with the second formula. The first formula is obtained if k2 determines the inclination of the orbit of the radiating electron, while the second formula is obtained if k2 determines the shape of the electron orbit. According to the calculations it is shown that ΔνmagR(Z−3.5)3=α214 or 3α232 according to the interpretation which is given to k2. To calculate this term use has been made of the model which was proposed by Landé to explain the relativity doublet on a magnetic basis. The second term is due to the difference in the magnetic energy of the excited atom corresponding to the two different k2 values of the radiating electron. The first term on the right hand side is due to the relativity change in the mass of the radiating electron in the two orbits which produce the relativity doublet, and which can be calculated according to Sommerfeld's formula. In order to account for this deviation it is supposed that the experimentally determined ΔνR=ΔνrelR+ΔνmagR. large in the case of the Fe group of elements. From these measurements it appears that the experimentally determined values of ΔνR(Z−3.5)4 deviate systematically from those calculated according to the relativity formula of Sommerfeld. In this paper attention is drawn to the recent measurements of the separation Δλ of the Kα doublets of the lighter elements from Al(13) to Ge(32) by Siegbahn and Ray and by Bäcklin.
1 Comment
7/1/2023 12:10:34 pm
En iyi yalova ilan sitesi burada. https://yalova.escorthun.com/
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |